‘The dog is returned to his vomit: and, The sow that was washed, to her wallowing in the mire.’

I was reflecting on my experiences as a very inadequate and unsuccessful apologist for the Catholic Faith when I realised that during the four years in which I attended Mass at the FFSPX/Resistance monastery, I could not recall the priests ever having given a sermon on John 3:5, (Link ), but that I had listened to various on the apparitions at Salette and Fatima ( given in appropriately severe Apocalyptic tones). When all of a sudden, like a thunderbolt, I was struck by the insanity and irrationality of these so-called traditional Catholic priests who deny the very clear explicit teachings of Our Lord, God Incarnate, on the necessity of Baptism and Faith for Salvation but believe in, and, what is worse, give credence to, the confused, hysterical ramblings of adolescent girls!

What kind of base, profane, carnal minds can reject the beauty of the Objective Spiritual Truths of Divine Revelation, the Dogmas of the Faith, in exchange for the spiritual dross that is Human Revelation? The Dogmas of the Faith are the Teachings of Our Lord, God Incarnate, to the Apostles which were handed down, carefully conserved, jealously guarded and energetically defended by Holy Men of the Church as Tradition, or the Deposit of the Faith, until they were thrown out at Vatican II. What kind of vulgar, trite minds can deny the simplicity and clarity of the teachings contained in the Gospels and Epistles but believe in the histrionic prophecies of Fatima and Salette, or the greeting card sentimentality of the promises of the Sacred Heart?

Private Revelation is only acceptable if it aids the understanding of the Faith. IT IS NOT MEANT TO SUPPLANT OR SUBSTITUTE IT!

III. CHRIST JESUS — “MEDIATOR AND FULLNESS OF ALL REVELATION”25

God has said everything in his Word

65 “In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son.”26 Christ, the Son of God made man, is the Father’s one, perfect and unsurpassable Word. In him he has said everything; there will be no other word than this one. St. John of the Cross, among others, commented strikingly on Hebrews 1:1-2:

In giving us his Son, his only Word (for he possesses no other), he spoke everything to us at once in this sole Word – and he has no more to say. . . because what he spoke before to the prophets in parts, he has now spoken all at once by giving us the All Who is His Son. Any person questioning God or desiring some vision or revelation would be guilty not only of foolish behavior but also of offending him, by not fixing his eyes entirely upon Christ and by living with the desire for some other novelty.
27

Throughout the ages, there have been so-called “private” revelations, some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church.

Link

So at Vatican II, the Word was rejected by the Church and every single so-called traditional sect, including the sedevacantistas, who are heretical in their Puritanism. Divine Revelation was rejected and supplanted by Human revelation. The roots of this abominable treachery were already apparent and identified by Dom Felix Sarda y Salvany, 130 years ago when he writes about Liberal Catholicism :-

Strange as may seem that anomaly called Liberal Catholicism, its reason is not far to seek. It takes its root in a false conception of the nature of the act of faith. The Liberal Catholic assumes as the formal motive of the act of faith, not the infallible authority of God revealing supernatural truth, but his own reason deigning to accept (40) as true what appears rational to him according to the appreciation and measure of his own individual judgement. He subjects God’s authority to the scrutiny of his reason, and not his reason to God’s authority. He accepts revelation not on account of the infallible revealer, but because of the “infallible” receiver. With him the individual judgement is the rule of faith. He believes in the independence of reason.” 

And:-

“Forgetting the divine and supernatural character of the Church, and she is nothing if not divine and supernatural, Liberal Catholics talk and write about her as a simple human development, accepting in the blindness of their false conception the naturalistic definition of faith. They thus eviscerate the Church, making her the mere husk of what she really is.

Piety itself does not escape the action of this pernicious naturalistic principle; it converts it into pietism that is to say, into a parody of true piety, as is painfully seen in the pious practices of so many people who seek in their devotions only the sentimental emotions of which they themselves are able to be the source. They are devout over themselves, worshipping their own little sentiments and offering incense to idols graven after their own image. This is simply spiritual sensualism, and nothing else. (45) Thus we see in our day in so many souls the degeneration of Christian asceticism, which is the purification of the heart by the repression of the appetites, and the falsification of Christian mysticism, which is neither emotion, nor interior consolation, nor any other Epicurean foible of human sentiment, but union with God through a supernatural love for Him and through absolute submission to His holy will.

Therefore is it that the Catholicity of a great number of people in our times is a Liberal Catholicity, or, rather, a false Catholicity. It is really not Catholicity, but mere naturalism, a pure rationalism; it is in a word paganism disguised in Catholic forms and using Catholic language.”

Link

I don’t know whether God has given me the grace of good instincts but even as a child I disliked the Fatima revelations and the promises of the Sacred Heart (and felt guilty about it). The hysterical language of one, and the sickly sentimentality of the other, just didn’t ring true to me. Our Lord, Jesus Christ, God Incarnate, was never sentimental. Just look at the language He uses to goad the Syrophoenician woman into her beautiful, and witty, confession of faith; or the strength of His rebukes when he condemns the impetuosity of Simon Peter; or His execration of the Pharisees for their hypocrisy. In this context, I think the following is very apt:-

6 But he answering, said to them: Well did Isaias prophesy of you, hypocrites, as it is written: *This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.

7 And in vain do they worship me, teaching doctrines and precepts of men.

St. John of the Cross had this to say about private revelation:-

“There is always ground for fear that they proceed from the devil rather than from God; for the devil has more influence in that which is exterior and corporeal . . . As they are so palpable and so material they excite the senses greatly and the soul is led to consider them the more important, the more they are felt. It runs after them and abandons the secure guidance of faith, thinking that the light they give is a guide and means to that which it desires, union with God. Thus the soul, the more it makes of such things, the more it strays from the perfect way and means, i.e., the faith. Besides, when the soul perceives itself subject to these extraordinary visitations, self-esteem very frequently enters in, and it thinks itself to be something in the eyes of God, which is contrary to humility. The devil also knows too well how to insinuate into the soul a secret, and sometimes open, self-satisfaction. For this end he frequently presents to the eyes the forms of saints, and most beautiful limits; he causes voices well-dissembled to strike the ear, and delicious odours the smell; he produces sweetness in the mouth, and thrills of pleasure in the sense of touch; and all to make us long for such things that he may lead us astray into much evil. For this reason, then, we must always reject and disregard these representations and sensations.”

And advised us:-

“I say, therefore, with respect to all these impressions and imaginary visions, and others of whatever kind they may be, which present themselves under forms or images, whether false as coming from the devil, or known to be true as coming from God, that the understanding is not to perplex itself about them, nor feed itself upon them; the soul must not willingly accept them, nor rest upon them, in order that it may be detached, naked, pure, and sincerely simple, which is the condition of the divine union.”

Link

St. John of The Cross’s teachings on private revelation are nicely summarised here:- Link.

The Church has been infiltrated and dominated, Catholics have been denied their catechism, and no longer profess the Catholic Faith but are reduced to pagans in their devotions to mere Human revelations. The whole world is now as pagan as it was before the Incarnation.

For by whom a man is overcome, of the same also he is the slave. [20] For if, flying from the pollutions of the world, through the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they be again entangled in them and overcome: their latter state is become unto them worse than the former.

[21] For it had been better for them not to have known the way of justice, than after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them. [22] For, that of the true proverb has happened to them: The dog is returned to his vomit: and, The sow that was washed, to her wallowing in the mire.

Link

 

‘Why should we be so lucky?’

For everyone, and I mean literally, everyone, to deny something that you actually lived through and witnessed is the most unnerving, disconcerting and indeed, frightening, experience that you can imagine. This has happened to me ever since I started to defend the catechism I received as a child, the doctrine of EENS. If it weren’t for the fact that I had previously read ‘Whilst the Eyes of the Great are Elsewhere’ by William Biersach, Link, I would seriously have started to doubt my own sanity. Biersach’s experiences as child and adolescent were very similar to mine and he describes with accuracy the feelings of bewilderment and confusion experienced by Catholics caused by the changes resulting from Vatican II.

As it was, I felt that I had somehow wandered into a parallel universe where lies were now the truth and the truth had become a lie. Which I suppose is an accurate depiction of the world after God permitted the sons of Satan to take over the running of the Church. I personally believe that He permitted this to punish the faithlessness of our forefathers in allowing the Catholic Faith to be undermined, consciously or otherwise, by Liberalism and Puritanism, both of which are offshoots of the Protestant heresy; the folly of which is being brought home to us now by the current destruction of our families, societies, nations and civilisation.

I had been attending the Latin Mass at a FSSPX monastery for four years when I was scandalized to find out that Dom Lebvre, the FSSPX and all the other so-called traditional sects believed in and taught the heresies of salvation by blood, desire and invincible ignorance. I had only recently learnt, as a result of reading Biersach’s book, that the Vatican II Church had adopted these heresies.

I immediately wrote to one of the priests at the monastery, asking him if they also believed in and taught these heresies. He confirmed this and replied, in the patronising tones of a doctor trying to comfort a recalcitrant mental patient, that there was absolutely no reason for me to be upset because Baptism of Desire had ALWAYS been the teaching of the Church. To support this, he cited those unfortunate speculations of St. Thomas Aquinas about the fate of catechumens who died before they could be baptised and the Catechism of the Council of Trent, which actually talks about justification and not salvation.

You could have knocked me down with a feather when this priest, who must have been born at least 15 to 20 years after Vatican II had the effrontery to tell me, someone who had been catechised well before the event, what Catholics were catechised to believe in and believed in before Vatican II.

You see, I still REMEMBER the catechism class in which the doctrine of EENS was explained to us for the first time. We must have been preparing for the sacrament of Confirmation. I remember the teacher and his name, Mr. Blacklock (RIP) . The reason I remember this particular class so clearly was because of the expression of surprise, wonder and gratification on each pupil’s face in a class of forty, seven or eight year olds, as the implications of the doctrine gradually dawned on us. We all looked round the classroom at each other as if to say ‘Why should we be so lucky!’

Yes, what had WE done to deserve the totally unmerited gift of salvation and redemption obtained for us by the humble and willing sacrifice of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, God Incarnate ? What had We done to deserve the gift of Faith bequeathed to us by our ancestors who had been hounded out of their lands, massacred, starved to death and sold into slavery by Protestants who, the Church now teaches, can be saved by ‘ the desire to do God’s will’. Our ancestors, who had been denied access to priests, the Mass and the sacraments for almost 400 years by the Protestants but had miraculously maintained the Faith to leave to us as a precious inheritance.

A Faith, which we supinely allowed ourselves to be defrauded of, bastardised and prostituted out by the diabolical theologians and clergy at Vatican II. The gift of Faith, which we and the clergy have stamped on, spat on and kicked out of the way like spoilt children on receiving a present whose value we don’t understand

And if anyone reading this is malicious enough to suggest that my memories are the ravings of a senile mind and that no one can remember a particular catechism class that took place almost sixty years ago, I also remember one of my Communion classes in which the teacher, Miss Veal (RIP), explained in tones of such awe and reverence, that I still get shivers up my spine when I recall it, that the host was the Real Body and Blood of Our Lord God, Jesus Christ and that is why one crumb was not allowed to fall to the ground to be trampled on. Then the Church introduced communion in the hand.

I also remember the pride I felt when our teachers explained that, because of the services in Latin, Catholicism was the only religion where you could go to Mass literally anywhere in the world and still participate. Then the Church introduced Mass in the vernacular.

I personally believe that since Vatican II, God has given us the Popes we deserve as punishment for our teachery and faithlessness, and it is only when we acknowledge and repent of our folly, humbly accept that we deserve our punishment, and once more profess

 the one, true Catholic Faith that our Church will be restored to us.

…that this class of men have been INSTIGATED BY SATAN to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God, and thus to a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith.

 And he commanded him, saying: Of every tree of paradise thou shalt eat: [17] But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat. For in what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death. [18]

And he said to the woman: Why hath God commanded you, that you should not eat of every tree of paradise? [2] And the woman answered him, saying: Of the fruit of the trees that are in paradise we do eat: [3] But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of paradise, God hath commanded us that we should not eat; and that we should not touch it, lest perhaps we die. [4]And the serpent said to the woman: No, you shall not die the death. [5] For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.

Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting. [17] For God sent not his Son into the world, to judge the world, but that the world may be saved by him. [18] He that believeth in him is not judged. But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God. [19] And this is the judgment: because the light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than the light: for their works were evil. [20] For every one that doth evil hateth the light, and cometh not to the light, that his works may not be reproved.

Link

SATAN: These teachings of God are far too hard. God is love! God is mercy! God is justice! God wouldn’t be so unreasonable as to condemn so many people to eternal perdition simply because they weren’t baptized into the Catholic Church and professed the Catholic Faith. It would be so unfair and unjust. Think of all the poor Eskimos in the Arctic and Indians in the jungle, how are they expected to become Catholics? Even if they were so inclined, they probably don’t even have access to the internet to discover the truth for themselves. I know that before Vatican II there were Catholic missions and missionaries all over the world but when my sons achieved power, they soon put a stop to that. Even so, it really is a very arbitrary and discriminatory doctrine. God can’t have really meant what he said.

Just look at the Evangelical protestants. You couldn’t wish to know a nicer group of well behaved, law-abiding people! They don’t drink, smoke or dance and they dress so modestly! They tithe, are charitable and have missionaries all over the world spreading the gospel. They all sincerely believe they are carrying out God’s will. Look how energetic they are in their opposition to legalization of abortion and homosexual marriage, even being prepared to go to jail for their beliefs. The traditional Bishop Williamson praised them for that!

I know many Catholics died as martyrs at the hands of of Protestants. But that was in the old days. If these martyrs had known what good people the protestants turned out to be and that the Church would change its doctrine about salvation, they would have realised that their sacrifice was unnecessary and futile!

When Christ was on the earth there were no Evangelical Christians but I’m sure that if there had been He would have understood, like you do, that they deserve to go to heaven just as much as Catholics do, especially nowadays. These days Catholics hardly go to Mass anymore and smoke, drink, dress immodestly and heaven forbid it, even dance! These simple, ignorant, uneducated Catholics who have retained the superstitious belief in the necessity of baptism for salvation and insist on having their children baptized, even though this belief was denied by the Church fifty-five years ago. My operatives in the Church have denied them their catechism, so on that count they probably won’t get to heaven anyway but even so, just to think that baptism might give them an advantage makes me mad!

And Muslims? I know, I know, they are getting a bad press these days. But as far modesty goes, they beat every single other religion hands down. You can’t get more modest than a full length burqa! The traditional Bishop Williamson even praised Muslim women for their modesty. I’m sure that most of these traditional Catholic men would be only too happy for their wives and daughters to adopt the custom. What with trousers, shorts and bikinis, the way women, even Catholic women, dress these days is scandalous!

As for chastity! I can guarantee you that you won’t find women as chaste as Muslim women anywhere in the world; their fathers and brothers see to that. And if they step out of line? Well the Muslim’s strong belief in the virtue of chastity has to be enforced somehow doesn’t it? Besides Muslims circumcise girls  so they don’t entertain any undesirable passions. Extreme, I know, but effective!

Of course Muslims deny that Christ was God and simply venerate Him as a prophet, which is more than my sons, your ‘elder brothers in faith” do. But at Vatican II it was declared that they worship the same God. If that is the case, why aren’t they allowed to go to heaven? And Muslims are so, so, sincere in their desire to do God’s will. They even go so far as to blow themselves up to carry it out, as long as they take some infidels with them. Amazingly dedicated and single-minded of them, don’t you think?

They do believe in divorce, but who doesn’t nowadays?  Even the Pope, Cardinals and Bishops of the Catholic Church are beginning to see reason and are about to relax the Church’s far too rigid and inhuman teachings on the matter. If it weren’t for the opposition of those pesky African bishops, it would be a walkover!  With the increase in life expectancy, it is too much to expect people to stay married to one person for the rest of their lives. The Muslims are far more advanced than other religions in the matter of marriage because, besides allowing for divorce, they let you have four wives! Unfortunately, it does mean that there is a shortage of women to go round for the other men and this does lead to a certain proclivity for rape.

Thousands of Catholic martyrs died at the hands of Muslims, defending Europe and the Catholic faith. If they had known then that Catholics and Muslims worshipped the same God, they needn’t have bothered. If you all worship the same God what difference does it make if Europe is Catholic or Islamic ? Their catechism must have been faulty. That great defender of the Latin Mass, Dom Lefebvre, taught that they could be saved, so why can’t they?

And the jews?  My sons, of course, cannot be denied heaven. If, as Vatican II declared, they are your ‘elder brothers in faith”  they should be given priority! Of course, they don’t follow the Torah but the talmud which has been their book since their captivity in Babylon, but very few people know that. The talmud does state that Jesus Christ, God’s Son, was a sorcerer and that He is suspended for eternity over a vat of boiling excrement, and that His Mother was a whore, and that Her Son was the fruit of her relationship with a Roman soldier. The Orthodox also believe that Christmas Eve is the most evil day of the year and that devils walk the earth on that day. That is the only day, I am very proud to say, the Orthodox don’t study the talmud but pass their time ripping up toilet paper or playing poker. But why waste our time over mere details? All the Popes since Vatican II have glossed over these minutiae and positively enjoy hobnobbing with my sons, but they do take care to hide their crucifixes whilst doing so.

Like any father, I am so proud of my children! Through lies, hypocrisy and usury they have managed to become the most powerful race on the face of the earth whilst at the same time convincing the world that they are perpetual innocent victims! Everyone feels sorry and guilty for their past sufferings (all lies of course) and they have received millions in compensation but they will never be satisfied. They own every central bank in the world except, of course, that of Iran and Syria, but they have managed to convince ‘Christian’ soldiers to fight and die so they can take over those too. Not one single person on the face of the earth is to escape their domination through usury.

I am proud to say that the scourges of Capitalism, Communism and Socialism, which have been the source of much death and misery for so many people all over the world, were all thought up by promoted by my sons. Look how clever and devious they are . They actually convinced Christian and Catholic soldiers to die in two world wars to further their aims of strengthening Communism and weaken the Catholic Church. These guillible fools actually still believe that the 2nd World War was a good war. They are proud of the role of their parents and grandparents in enabling the rise of communism which has lead the destruction of their families, communities and nations. Really, the brainwashing techniques of my sons are second to none!

The Protestants gave my sons the power to create central banks, print money and charge interest and now every single nation in the world is in debt to them. They own every government and every politician and in the so-called ‘democracies’, they have created parties of the right and left to give the simple-minded an illusion of choice but in reality they own every single politician. They soon destroy anybody who tries to stand up to them.

The Muslims and the Protestants were always my tools for the destruction of the Catholic Church, Faith and civilization which I finally achieved at Vatican II. How did I finally achieve it? Well it’s been a long arduous task. The Protestants did a lot of the ground work for me of course, by denying the authority of the Church and the reality of the Divinely Revealed Objective Truths, the dogmas of the Faith. The denial of God’s authority has always had an appeal to mankind’s spiritual and intellectual pride. Nobody likes to recognize that anyone is superior to them. I can empathize with that! But my sons, with the aid of philosophers and other very intelligent men managed to convince Catholics that they were wiser than God and that His teachings about the necessity of baptism and faith were very unfair! Of course, once we got them to deny the necessity of baptism with water for salvation, it was child’s play to convince them that the doctrines of Original Sin and the necessity of the Son of God’s redemptive sacrifice are just fables.

My 2,000 year battle to destroy the Catholic Church, the Catholic Faith and Catholic civilization is nearing its end and I am in complete charge without any opposition. The only obstacle to my complete control would be if people wake up to the folly of their ways, repent and begin to believe and profess the Catholic Faith once more. This is the danger!